**BJP MLA Agnimitra Paul Supports Nishikant Dubey’s Controversial Remarks on Judiciary**
In the midst of the ongoing debate surrounding BJP MP Nishikant Dubey’s comments about the judiciary, West Bengal BJP MLA Agnimitra Paul has publicly expressed her support for him. She has raised questions regarding the Chief Justice of India’s (CJI) authority in relation to the legislature, emphasizing the importance of the President’s role in appointing the CJI. Paul stated, “He has said the right thing. The President appoints the Chief Justice of India. Then how can the CJI deny the President’s order? How can he deny the decision of the MPs and policymakers of the nation? If the country is run by the CJI and the Supreme Court, then there is no need for the Parliament. Everything should be done by the CJI then.”
Her remarks come in response to Dubey’s earlier assertion that if the Supreme Court is to make laws, then Parliament should be dissolved. This statement, shared on social media and reiterated in interviews, has ignited discussions about the balance of power between the judiciary and the legislature in a democratic society.
The BJP’s central leadership has distanced itself from Dubey’s comments, with party president JP Nadda labeling them as his “personal opinion” and reaffirming the party’s respect for the judiciary as an institution.
This controversy arises against the backdrop of the Supreme Court’s ongoing examination of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The court has raised concerns about specific provisions of the Act, including the ‘Waqf by user’ clause. In response, the government has assured the court that certain aspects of the Act will not be enforced until the next hearing scheduled for May 5.
As the dialogue continues, the implications of these statements on the relationship between the branches of government remain a critical topic of discussion.
**FAQ**
**What sparked the controversy over Nishikant Dubey’s remarks?**
Nishikant Dubey’s comments suggested that if the Supreme Court is responsible for making laws, then Parliament should be shut down, leading to a debate about the roles of the judiciary and legislature.