**Title:** BJP MP Nishikant Dubey Sparks Controversy Over Waqf Act
**Meta Description:** BJP MP Nishikant Dubey engages in a heated online debate with former CEC SY Quraishi over the Waqf Amendment Act, raising questions about voter ID issuance.
**URL Slug:** bjp-mp-nishikant-dubey-waqf-act-controversy
**Headline:** BJP MP Nishikant Dubey Engages in Controversial Debate Over Waqf Amendment Act
In a recent online exchange, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey found himself at the center of controversy following his remarks about the Supreme Court and Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna. The incident unfolded on Sunday morning when Dubey clashed with former Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) SY Quraishi regarding the contentious Waqf Amendment Act.
Quraishi, who served as India’s 17th CEC from July 30, 2010, to June 10, 2012, criticized the Waqf Act, labeling it a “sinister plan” by the government to seize Muslim lands. He expressed confidence that the Supreme Court would address the issue, stating that misinformation from the government had effectively misled the public.
In response, Dubey accused Quraishi of being “not an Election Commissioner, but a Muslim Commissioner,” alleging that during Quraishi’s tenure, a significant number of Bangladeshi infiltrators were granted voter IDs in Jharkhand’s Santhal Pargana division, which falls under Dubey’s representation in the Godda Lok Sabha constituency.
Dubey’s comments were made in reaction to Quraishi’s post on social media platform X, where the former CEC voiced his concerns about the Waqf Act. Additionally, Dubey shared historical context, asserting that Islam was introduced to India by Prophet Muhammad in 712 AD, and prior to that, the land was associated with Hindu, tribal, Jain, or Buddhist faiths. He recounted the destruction of his village, Vikramshila, by Bakhtiyar Khilji in 1189, emphasizing the need for national unity and a collective understanding of history.
The BJP distanced itself from Dubey’s remarks, with party president J P Nadda clarifying that the comments made by Dubey and fellow MP Dinesh Sharma regarding the judiciary and CJI were personal opinions and not reflective of the party’s stance. Nadda firmly stated that the BJP does not support such remarks.
Dinesh Sharma, who previously served as the deputy chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, also criticized the Supreme Court, asserting that no entity can direct Parliament or the President.
As the debate continues, the implications of these statements on the political landscape and public discourse remain to be seen.
**FAQ Section:**
**Q: What sparked the controversy involving BJP MP Nishikant Dubey?**
A: The controversy arose from Dubey’s comments about the Supreme Court and former CEC SY Quraishi regarding the Waqf Amendment Act, leading to a heated online exchange.

