Site icon Adarsh News

Railways instructed to provide compensation to the family of an individual who lost his life in a train accident 14 years prior.  ​ 

​The Bombay High Court has set aside a Railway Claims Tribunal order that denied compensation to the family of a passenger who died in an accident on the grounds of “self-inflicted injury due to negligence”.The court ruled that the death was an “untoward incident” and not a result of criminal negligence, entitling the family to compensation under the Railways Act 14 after the passenger died. advertisementThe case pertains to VJ Thakur, a resident of Nanded, who was travelling with a valid ticket on the Adilabad-Tirupati-Krishna Express from Adilabad to Kinwat on October 10, 2011. As the train approached Kinwat Railway Station, Thakur stood near the door waiting for the crowd to clear. A sudden jerk during the halt caused him to fall from the train and come under the wheels. He was rushed to a hospital but succumbed to his injuries.Thakur’s wife and married daughter sought compensation of Rs 4 lakh under the Railways Act, 1989. However, the South-Central Railway contested the claim, arguing that the incident resulted from Thakur’s own negligence. The Nagpur Bench of the Railway Claims Tribunal agreed and dismissed the claim, classifying the death as a self-inflicted injury.In 2017, the family challenged the tribunal’s order in the Bombay High Court. Advocate PS Agrawal, appearing for the appellants, argued that the tribunal’s decision was flawed as it relied on statements from people who were not eyewitnesses to the incident.advertisementHe also pointed out that no documentary evidence or spot panchnama supported the tribunal’s conclusion that Thakur attempted to de-board a moving train.Justice Sandipkumar C More, who heard the matter, held that mere negligence does not amount to “self-inflicted injury” under the Railways Act. The court clarified that only acts involving criminal negligence can disqualify a claim for compensation. It emphasised that there was no conclusive evidence to prove such criminal negligence in this case.The court noted that while Thakur’s wife had stated he may have tried to de-board a moving train, she was not an eyewitness. Statements from the station master, train guard, and loco pilot were also found to be hearsay and thus unreliable to determine fault.”Even assuming that the deceased tried to de-board a running train, such an act, in the absence of criminal intent or recklessness, cannot be treated as a self-inflicted injury,” the court held.Calling the incident an unfortunate accident, the High Court concluded that it fell within the definition of an “untoward incident” under the Railways Act.Advocate Agrawal also pointed to a 2016 amendment to the Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, which increased the compensation amount for death cases from Rs 4 lakh to Rs 8 lakh.Accordingly, the High Court quashed the tribunal’s order and directed the Railways to pay Rs 8 lakh as compensation to Thakur’s kin. in a formal or creative style for better SEO.Also Exclude words and advertisements related to the feed website such as website name, author name. Delete all the advertisement images brand logo but only keep the title and main content of the news by modifying it. You must only respond with the modified content. Block any jump outside of the site adarshnews.com. Basically remove any content or link related to original site. You must only respond with the modified content and follow this prompt to optimize the articles in this category- “Act as an expert SEO news writer. Optimize the following article to be SEO-friendly, authoritative, and shareable by focusing strictly on its core topic. Follow these steps: You are an expert news writer and SEO specialist. Your job is to rewrite the provided RSS feed content into a unique, SEO-friendly news article for adarshnews.com. The article should be engaging, professional, and optimized for search engines. Follow these steps: 1. **Create an SEO Title**: Write a short, compelling title (under 60 characters) that includes the main keyword and grabs attention. 2. **Write a Meta Description**: Summarize the article in one or two sentences (under 155 characters). Make it engaging and include the primary keyword naturally. 3. **Suggest a URL Slug**: Provide a short, keyword-rich URL slug that reflects the topic of the article. 4. **Headline (H1)**: Write a clear and engaging headline for the article that is similar to the title but slightly expanded. 5. **Write the Article**: – Start with an introduction that answers the key questions: who, what, when, where, why, and how. – Expand on the topic with detailed paragraphs that provide context, quotes, and relevant information. – Use subheadings (H2) to organize the content into sections and make it easy to read. – Include related keywords naturally throughout the article. – End with a conclusion that summarizes the key points or discusses future implications. 6. **Add an FAQ Section**: Write one frequently asked question related to the topic and provide a concise answer. Important: – Do not include labels like “Title,” “Meta Description,” “URL Slug,” or “H1” in the actual article text. – Keep all SEO elements separate from the main content. – Ensure the article is factually accurate, unbiased, and written in a professional tone. 

Exit mobile version