**RCB Challenges Tribunal’s Remarks on Chinnaswamy Stadium Stampede**
The Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) have taken legal action against the Karnataka High Court, contesting the Central Administrative Tribunal’s (CAT) preliminary findings that deemed the franchise responsible for the tragic stampede outside Chinnaswamy Stadium on June 4, which resulted in 11 fatalities and over 50 injuries. RCB’s petition argues that the tribunal’s negative comments were made without allowing the franchise to present its defense, thereby breaching principles of natural justice.
In the petition, filed by advocate Raghuram Cadambi, RCB emphasized that despite not being a party to the proceedings, the tribunal held the franchise prima facie accountable. The plea highlighted that the findings contradicted natural justice, as RCB was not given an opportunity to be heard.
The stampede occurred when an estimated crowd of three to five lakh gathered to celebrate RCB’s first IPL title win in 18 years. Following their victory, RCB announced a victory parade on social media, which the CAT criticized as a “nuisance” created without the necessary police permissions. The tribunal noted that the sudden announcement of the parade did not allow sufficient time for police to make the necessary arrangements, stating, “It cannot be expected from the Police that within a short time of about 12 hours the police will make all arrangements required in the Police Act or in the other rules, etc.”
Furthermore, the tribunal defended the police’s role, asserting that law enforcement personnel are human beings and not capable of fulfilling every wish instantaneously, likening their limitations to that of a magician.
In conclusion, RCB’s legal challenge underscores the complexities surrounding accountability and safety measures during large public events, particularly in the wake of such a tragic incident.
**FAQ**
**What was the outcome of the stampede outside Chinnaswamy Stadium?**
The stampede resulted in 11 deaths and over 50 injuries, prompting RCB to challenge the tribunal’s findings regarding their responsibility in the incident.
