**Title:** Amit Shah Criticizes Opposition Over Controversial Bills
**Meta Description:** Amit Shah defends new bills aimed at removing jailed leaders, criticizing opposition for their stance, particularly targeting Arvind Kejriwal.
**URL Slug:** amit-shah-opposition-controversial-bills
**Headline:** Amit Shah Slams Opposition for Resistance to Bills on Jailed Leaders
Union Home Minister Amit Shah has taken a strong stance against opposition parties opposing three controversial bills that propose the removal of leaders from top offices if they are imprisoned for over 30 days for serious offenses. During an event in Thiruvananthapuram, Shah specifically referenced former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, suggesting that had Kejriwal resigned while in jail, there would have been no need for such legislation.
Kejriwal, who was arrested in 2024 in connection with the alleged Delhi liquor scam, faced significant criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for continuing to govern from jail. Similarly, Tamil Nadu Minister V Senthil Balaji was arrested in 2023 for money laundering, yet Chief Minister MK Stalin retained him in the cabinet without a portfolio until he was granted bail by the Supreme Court.
Shah argued, “The Chief Minister of Delhi was running the government even after going to jail. Should the constitution be changed or not? If Kejriwal had resigned, there would have been no need for this law today.” He emphasized that the bills are a crucial anti-corruption measure and moved a motion in the Lok Sabha to refer them to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for thorough examination.
While the government defends the legislation as a necessary step to combat corruption and prevent leaders involved in serious criminal activities from holding public office, the opposition has labeled the bills as “draconian” and “unconstitutional.” They accuse the ruling BJP of intending to misuse central agencies to target non-BJP chief ministers, imprison them, and destabilize state governments.
As the bills were introduced, opposition members protested vehemently, with some tearing up copies of the legislation and throwing them towards the Treasury benches. In response, Shah maintained that the bills are not aimed at any specific party and would apply equally to BJP leaders, including the Prime Minister.
He questioned whether the public supports the idea of any Prime Minister or chief minister governing from jail, asserting that the Constitution did not previously account for such scenarios. Shah noted that many past chief ministers and ministers have resigned after serving time in jail, indicating that the law was only amended now due to recent developments.
In conclusion, the introduction of these bills has sparked significant debate, highlighting the ongoing tensions between the ruling party and the opposition regarding governance and accountability in cases of serious criminal allegations.
**FAQ Section:**
**Q: What are the key provisions of the controversial bills introduced by Amit Shah?**
A: The bills propose the removal of leaders from top offices if they are jailed for more than 30 days for offenses carrying a minimum sentence of five years, aiming to enhance accountability and combat corruption in governance.
