**Sabrina Carpenter Condemns White House Video Using Her Song**
Sabrina Carpenter has publicly criticized a White House video that features her song, describing it as “evil and disgusting.” The video, which depicts the detention of migrants, uses Carpenter’s upbeat track “Juno” as a backdrop to images of immigration agents apprehending individuals. In a statement on social media, Carpenter expressed her disapproval, stating, “Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda.”
The controversial video was shared on social media and has garnered over 1.2 million views since its release. It aligns with President Trump’s contentious immigration policies, which have faced significant backlash, including protests and legal challenges. Critics argue that these policies, which aim to forcibly round up undocumented immigrants, disproportionately affect individuals who have lived and worked in the U.S. for years without any criminal records.
Carpenter is not alone in her condemnation; fellow artists Olivia Rodrigo and Jess Glynne have also voiced their concerns regarding the use of their music in similar contexts. Rodrigo previously warned the White House against using her songs to promote what she termed “racist, hateful propaganda” after her track “All-American Bitch” was featured in a video urging undocumented migrants to leave voluntarily.
As the debate over immigration policy continues, the use of music by artists in political messaging raises important questions about consent and the ethical implications of such actions.
**FAQ**
*Why did Sabrina Carpenter criticize the White House video?*
Sabrina Carpenter criticized the White House video for using her song in a context she deemed “evil and disgusting,” as it depicted the detention of migrants and aligned with inhumane immigration policies.
