**Delhi Court Criticizes Ambulance Staff in BMW Crash Case**
A Delhi court has granted bail to Gaganpreet, the accused in a BMW crash case, while expressing strong disapproval of the ambulance staff’s actions at the accident scene. The court highlighted that an official ambulance was “miraculously” positioned just behind the vehicles involved in the crash and arrived within two seconds, yet failed to assist the injured motorcyclist. CCTV footage confirmed that the ambulance was empty, had no other assignments, and was en route to a base hospital. Despite this, the ambulance personnel did not provide aid to the victim and quickly left the scene.
The court described the behavior of the ambulance driver and paramedic as “highly unprofessional and unethical,” noting that they did not even check the victim’s pulse before departing. These observations were made prior to granting bail to Gaganpreet, as the court identified inconsistencies in the prosecution’s account of the incident. The CCTV footage altered the initial assessment of the case, diminishing the allegations of culpable homicide.
The court pointed out that the First Information Report (FIR) claimed the BMW struck the motorcycle directly from behind, a narrative that was not supported by the video evidence. Instead, the footage depicted the car losing control, hitting a divider, flipping over, and subsequently making contact with both a motorcycle and a bus.
**Questioning the ‘Golden Hour’ Theory**
The footage also showed the paramedic and driver briefly approaching the scene before returning to their vehicle within 40 seconds and driving away. This behavior undermined the prosecution’s “golden hour” theory, which posited that timely medical intervention could have saved the victim’s life. The court noted that the post-mortem report, which would provide the exact time of death, was still pending. Until that report is available, the assertion that delayed treatment led to the victim’s death remains unproven.
In summary, the court’s decision to grant bail was influenced by the lack of evidence supporting the prosecution’s claims and the questionable actions of the ambulance staff at the scene of the accident.
**FAQ**
**What were the main criticisms of the ambulance staff in the Delhi crash case?**
The court criticized the ambulance staff for their unprofessional conduct, noting they arrived quickly but failed to assist the injured motorcyclist, leaving the scene without providing any aid.
